menu

Mets Should Pursue Chris Archer

After all that transpired during the 2019 season and the complete organization overhaul, it’s clear the Pittsburgh Pirates are rebuilding their organization. While the name we have heard floating in trade rumors is Starling Marte, it is very possible the Pirates would be willing to move Chris Archer as well. If that is the case, the Mets should be interested.

One of the reasons to pursue him is Archer is likely at the nadir of his trade value after what has been a terrible stint with the Pirates giving a team an opportunity to obtain him and return him to what he once was with the Tampa Bay Rays.

Putting aside his short Major League debut in 2012, Archer set career worsts in ERA, IP, ERA+, FIP, WHIP, HR/9, and BB/9. He was also near his worst in other categories. Additionally, Archer would be shut down towards the end of August with right shoulder inflammation. Although, it should be noted that did not stop the Pirates from picking up his $9 million option.

Even with the down year, Archer did show a flash he could be a very good pitcher again. In his four August starts before being shut down, he had a 3.00 ERA, 1.278 WHIP, and a 13.5 K/9. It is a short sample size for sure, but it was an encouraging sign. There were other encouraging signs as well.

According to Baseball Savant, Archer had above average fastball velocity and elite curve ball spin. This was part of the reason why he had a very good strikeout rate. For him, that did not translate to dominating results. One of the reasons why is his location was poor and/or he was pitching to the wrong parts of the strike zone. It certainly didn’t help that he was not catching the bottom of the strike zone like he once did, and he was hit hard.

To a certain extent, that’s not unlike the struggles Noah Syndergaard experienced in 2019. To that end, the same issues which Syndergaard faced with the new ball affected Archer’s performance as well. Conversely, as noted by Thomas Bassinger of the Tampa Bay Times, this has been an issue with Archer since 2018. Ironically, his catcher that year was Wilson Ramos.

When it comes to Syndergaard, new Mets pitching coach Jeremy Hefner is going to have to find a way to figure out how to get Syndergaard to succeed with Ramos behind the plate. If he is successful, we should expect Syndergaard to return to his 2016 level. If Hefner is going to be successful in that endeavor, he can have the same exact impact on Archer who attacks batters and the zone in a similar fashion.

If you are the Mets, you are gambling on Hefner making things work between Syndergaard and Ramos. The season is going to sink or swim based upon his ability to get through to the two of them. If that is where you are hedging your bets, you might as well go all-in and try to do the same with Archer.

This is the boat the Mets are in now that they let Zack Wheeler go to the Phillies. The question for the team is do they try to sink or swim with an Archer or slowly drift out to sea with a pitcher like Rick Porcello. Given the Mets plan, Archer seems like the better option.

4 thoughts on “Mets Should Pursue Chris Archer”

  1. Oldbackstop says:

    First off we should be looking for a lefty, and Archer and Porcello are both righties.

    They are basically a coin toss, both fine for a number five, a concept I know eludes you. Porcello is three years removed from a Cy Young. He is projected to get about what Archer is contracted for over the next two years. You hope they both have bounce back years.

    I would rather find a lefty, preferably somebody we don’t have to trade anybody significant for…

    We would have to give up so.ething substantial in trade for A

    1. metsdaddy says:

      No, the Mets should be looking for the best possible pitcher. Left and right handed balance matters for the bullpen, not the rotation.

  2. Blair M. Schirmer says:

    “One of the reasons to pursue him is Archer is likely at the nadir of his trade value…”

    —Also, overwhelmingly, the reason NOT to pursue Archer. “He’s never been worse, ergo he’s cheap!” is not a selling point. I wouldn’t take him for nothing but salary. 120 innings with a FIP over 5? That’s a money pit.

    As for the 10m AAV neighborhood we seem to be in, if that’s the Mets price point, the Rangers have shown how its done with Mike Minor (who had durability concerns but with an ERA his previous year 1/2 that of Archer), then Lance Lynn (4.04 ERA, 4.37 FIP in 2017-2018 in 343ip), and now Kyle Gibson. You get moderately successful pitchers who are likely to be average, and have upside. You bet on your judgment and make your 3/30m offer to the #3-4 pitcher with the best stuff that you think you might improve. There’s no reason to take a dump trade in that salary range. The new market inefficiency is probably mid-rotation guys with upside. That’s not Chris Archer.

    1. metsdaddy says:

      That’s literally a significant motivation for trades. You’re actively looking to find guys who are undervalued and could be a boon to you and your team.

      Archer has the stuff of a top of the rotation starter, and you have just hired a pitching coach you believe can get the most out of their guys.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *